Micropolarization carried out according to professor Sheliakin's guidelines is safe

This me­thod ne­ither da­ma­ges bra­in cells nor im­pa­irs the­ir func­tions. The hi­sto­ry of re­se­arch on the in­flu­en­ce of elec­tri­ci­ty on bra­in tis­sue star­ted in 19th cen­tu­ry. Sin­ce the 1960’s nu­me­ro­us re­se­arch and pu­bli­ca­tions con­firm  both the ef­fec­ti­vness and sa­fe­ty of mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion. In one stu­dy over 600 chil­dren who un­der­go­ne both clas­si­cal phy­sio­the­ra­py and mi­cro­po­la­iza­tion ha­ve be­en  exa­mi­ned. Po­si­ti­ve re­sults we­re ob­se­rved in most of them. To this day over the­re are over 2000 pa­tients with dif­fe­rent neu­ral sys­tem di­sor­ders in­c­lu­ding se­ve­re epi­lep­sy ca­ses in St. Pe­ters­burg alo­ne who ha­ve un­der­go­ne mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion the­ra­pies.

Du­ring mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion a di­rect cur­rent of a ve­ry low in­ten­si­ty is ap­plied. It is com­pa­ra­ble to the phy­sio­lo­gi­cal pro­ces­ses oc­cur­ring in the li­ving or­ga­nism. Ana­ly­sis of a num­ber of expe­ri­men­tal stu­dies sho­wed that the most ap­pro­pria­te and phy­sio­lo­gi­cal ef­fects on the ne­rvo­us sys­tem and the gra­du­al im­pro­ve­ment of its func­tio­ning can be achie­ved by using we­ak di­rect cur­rent. Con­trol te­sts con­duc­ted in pa­tients con­firm the po­si­ti­ve ef­fect of mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion on the re­sults of EEG, and EP (EP-e­vo­ked po­ten­tials).

Ch­ro­nic da­ma­ge to the cen­tral ne­rvo­us sys­tem (CNS) is a pa­tho­lo­gy that can cau­se a va­rie­ty of pa­tho­lo­gi­cal pro­ces­ses. The pur­po­se of the mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion  the­ra­py  is to  "acqu­ire” ad­di­tio­nal struc­tu­res and sys­tems which are re­si­stant to pa­tho­lo­gi­cal re­ac­tions. This is a lon­g-la­sting pro­cess, which must be re­pe­ated se­ve­ral ti­mes in or­der to stren­gh­ten the po­si­ti­ve pat­terns  for CNS. Thanks to the in­vo­lve­ment of the cau­da­te nuc­leus and the amyg­da­la, which are a na­tu­ral "bra­ke" for CNS,  mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion can be help­ful in the pre­ven­tion of pa­tho­lo­gi­cal re­ac­tions, help con­trol­ling them and pro­gres­si­ve­ly eli­mi­na­te them using the CNS "bra­ke me­cha­nism". This pro­cess al­so in­c­lu­des epi­lep­tic so­ur­ce lo­ca­li­za­tions.

In or­der to pro­du­ce strong po­si­ti­ve ef­fects and use them to cre­ate new bench­marks for the func­tio­ning of the CNS, it is ne­ces­sa­ry to cre­ate a new func­tio­nal sta­te of the CNS by qu­ali­ta­ti­ve chan­ges in bra­in ac­ti­vi­ty, its struc­tu­res and sys­tems. This chan­ge in the CNS or­ga­ni­za­tion is long-la­sting and re­qu­ires re­pe­ated cyc­les. The re­sult is ac­ti­va­tion of the con­trol sys­tem of the pa­tho­lo­gi­cal CNS re­ac­tions. The­re­fo­re, we re­com­mend a 2 to 4 mon­ths in­te­rval be­twe­en mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion ses­sions.

The task of mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion is to run the sel­f-re­gu­la­to­ry me­cha­ni­sms and thus cre­ation of new or „fi­xing" mal­func­tio­ning con­nec­tions in the CNS and con­se­qu­en­tly im­pro­ve­ment in func­tio­ning of the who­le or­ga­nism. Mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion is a me­thod with a strong im­pact on the CNS, ho­we­ver, this me­thod is com­ple­te­ly sa­fe and ne­ither it cau­ses neu­ro­nal da­ma­ge (eg. lack of neu­ro­nal da­ma­ge mar­ker in the form of in­cre­ased con­cen­tra­tions of se­rum neu­ro­n-spe­ci­fic eno­la­se), nor chan­ges in ima­ging (MRI) or the pa­tho­lo­gic EEG wa­ves.

The appearance of adverse symptoms or reactions may be associated with the elimination of malfunctioning connections, or activation of new ones that are to replace them. Therefore, it is essential to fill out the diary, which will help us to constantly analyze the effects of the therapy of your child and adjust treatment parameters if necessary.
First effects of the therapy can be seen after 3 - 4 sessions (typically 5 -10 days after completion of the session although in some cases up to a month).

Please note the following in the diary if occurred:

  • ­symp­toms be­fo­re star­ting the mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion the­ra­py
  • ­symp­toms that oc­cur­red du­ring the the­ra­py (+)
  • ­e­sca­la­tion of symp­toms: we­ak (+), mo­de­ra­te (++), strong (+++)
  • ­de­sca­la­tion of symp­toms: we­ak (+), mo­de­ra­te (++), strong (+++)
Download the therapy diary

Ple­ase al­so no­te any chan­ges in be­ha­vior or con­di­tion of the pa­tient, as well as oc­cur­ren­ce or di­sap­pe­aran­ce  of any other symp­toms than tho­se men­tio­ned an­d/or other the­ra­pies du­ring the mi­cro­po­la­ri­za­tion the­ra­py co­ur­se.

The for­th­co­ming month after the the­ra­py ple­ase gi­ve us a we­ekly fe­ed­back on the ef­fects the the­ra­py.